SipXecs 4.6 uses Freeswitch 1.0.7

[Niek Vlessert]

Hello all,

SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

Regards,

Niek Vlessert
Telecats B.V.

[Douglas Hubler]

Post by Niek Vlessert
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other
things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you
want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official
RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works.
There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download.

[Niek Vlessert]

We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues.

Thanks for the info.

Regards

Post by Douglas Hubler

Post by Niek Vlessert
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other
things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you
want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official
RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works.
There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

[Niek Vlessert]

Excuse me, what we did was this, even easier:
- Add Official Freeswitch repo
- yum update
- This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean)
- Done :)

Post by Niek Vlessert
We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues.
Thanks for the info.
Regards

Post by Douglas Hubler

Post by Niek Vlessert
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other
things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you
want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official
RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works.
There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

[Douglas Hubler]

This made my day,
A.) FS 1.2.1 works
B.) FS from their repo just works

Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and
use this method until 4.6.1 comes out.

Post by Niek Vlessert
- Add Official Freeswitch repo
- yum update
- This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean)
- Done :)

Post by Niek Vlessert
We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues.
Thanks for the info.
Regards

Post by Douglas Hubler

Post by Niek Vlessert
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other
things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you
want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official
RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works.
There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

[Todd Hodgen]

Not exactly a regression test. Might want to do with abundance of caution
Sent from my twiddling thumbs.

Post by Douglas Hubler
This made my day,
A.) FS 1.2.1 works
B.) FS from their repo just works
Thanks Niek. I guess the answer is that is unofficially works, and
use this method until 4.6.1 comes out.

Post by Niek Vlessert
- Add Official Freeswitch repo
- yum update
- This removes the freeswitch rpm package provided with sipxecs (not the freeswitch sipxecs package if you know what I mean)
- Done :)

Post by Niek Vlessert
We did try it, by removing the SipXecs Freeswitch RPM and installing 'official' Freeswitch 1.2.1 RPM's. Very basic testing showed no issues.
Thanks for the info.
Regards

Post by Douglas Hubler

Post by Niek Vlessert
SipXecs 4.6 seems to still use Freeswitch 1.0.7, why is this? Freeswitch 1.2.1 is available with a lot of nice features. Is it because 1.2.1 is too new?

No, not because it's too new, because we just got caught up in other
things. We should put this on the list for 4.6.1 to upgrade. If you
want to test, you should be able to build FS 1.2.1 or find an official
RPM somewhere and install it in a 4.6 system and see if it works.
There's nothing special about the build of FS on sipxecs download.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/