Discussion:
Multiple remote worker issues?
Nathaniel Watkins
2012-08-08 20:05:09 UTC
Permalink
I've never had a reason to attempt multiple remote workers from a single remote location. Will this work, or can there only be 1 remote phone on the far end over a NAT'ed connection?

This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission.


Garrett County Government,
203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 www.garrettcounty.org
Tony Graziano
2012-08-08 21:21:25 UTC
Permalink
Since the remote phones are going through a site router their origination
port should be different for each device (when it is nat'ted), and it will
work.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: ***@voice.myitdepartment.net
Fax: 434.465.6833
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Linked-In Profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
Ask about our Internet Fax services!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab
2013!
Post by Nathaniel Watkins
I've never had a reason to attempt multiple remote workers from a single
remote location. Will this work, or can there only be 1 remote phone on
the far end over a NAT'ed connection?
This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the
individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or
entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original,
and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County
Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or
omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email
transmission.
Garrett County Government,
203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550
www.garrettcounty.org
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
--
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: ***@voice.myitdepartment.net

Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net
Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
Tommy Laino
2012-08-09 02:40:52 UTC
Permalink
I have a few SipX running with as many as 6 remote workers
at a location. Like Tony said it will work fine.
--
Tommy Laino
Dome Technologies
Cristian Luna
2012-08-09 12:02:11 UTC
Permalink
Use Karoo for remote user, is a good solution.

I have a lot a remote users in Argentine, Uruguay, Colombia and USA, only
issues with remote user in USA with Polycom IP550 and your provider of
internet is Comcast, the issues in DTMF with call to conference or IVR.

Cristian Luna
Post by Tommy Laino
I have a few SipX running with as many as 6 remote workers
at a location. Like Tony said it will work fine.
--
Tommy Laino
Dome Technologies
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
Gerald Drouillard
2012-08-09 02:26:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nathaniel Watkins
I've never had a reason to attempt multiple remote workers from a single remote location. Will this work, or can there only be 1 remote phone on the far end over a NAT'ed connection?
This message and any files transmitted with it are intended only for the individual(s) or entity named. If you are not the intended individual(s) or entity named you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance upon its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender, delete the original, and destroy all copies. Email transmissions cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Garrett County Government therefore does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of email transmission.
Garrett County Government,
203 South Fourth Street, Courthouse, Oakland, Maryland 21550 www.garrettcounty.org
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
We have better luck with difficult locations using tcp instead of udp.
--
Regards
--------------------------------------
Gerald Drouillard
Technology Architect
Drouillard & Associates, Inc.
http://www.Drouillard.biz
Loading...